Comments on: Java weirdness http://www.pitr.net/index.php/2009/01/31/java-weirdness/ Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:38:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: pj http://www.pitr.net/index.php/2009/01/31/java-weirdness/comment-page-1/#comment-12610 pj Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:15:02 +0000 http://www.pitr.net/?p=56#comment-12610 You, sir, just won a beer! Let me know where you live, next time I'm in canada :-) You, sir, just won a beer!
Let me know where you live, next time I’m in canada :-)

]]> By: alex http://www.pitr.net/index.php/2009/01/31/java-weirdness/comment-page-1/#comment-12601 alex Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:54:03 +0000 http://www.pitr.net/?p=56#comment-12601 Compound operators do implicit casting for you --> x +=2.5 so your double is casted to int. While arithmetical operation x+2.5 has to result to integer, so you have to explicitly cast to (int)2.5 --> x= x + (int)2.5 What is says - both statements are not equivalent and can produce different results. I agree this is a weird. Compound operators do implicit casting for you –> x +=2.5 so your double is casted to int.

While arithmetical operation x+2.5 has to result to integer, so you have to explicitly cast to (int)2.5 –> x= x + (int)2.5

What is says – both statements are not equivalent and can produce different results.
I agree this is a weird.

]]>